‘What Matty wants’

By Joel Thurtell

Confused by all the mumbo-jumbo we’re hearing from Matty Moroun’s public relations whores?

Here’s a simple suggestion for cutting through the crap.

Whenever you see a statement from one of the billionaire Ambassador Bridge owner’s PR goons about the “constitution” this and the “constitution” that, just perform this little mental switcheroo:

Every time you read “constitution,” just think “what Matty wants.”

Ready?

Here’s a practice example from an actual news article:

Mickey Blashfield, head of the ballot committee and director of
government relations for Moroun’s bridge company, argued that the
referendum would require a vote on the NITC regardless of any language
in the agreement.

“Wow,” he said earlier Thursday. “That’s an amazing assumption that a
proposal signed by a bureaucrat and a foreign sovereign nation would
take precedent over the constitution.”

Now, convert “constitution” to “what Matty wants.”

Let’s try it:

“Wow. That’s an amazing assumption that a
proposal signed by a bureaucrat and a foreign sovereign nation would
take precedent over what Matty wants.”

See what I mean?

It’s a nifty little trick for deep-sixing Matty’s bullshit and cutting to the real story.

Matty doesn’t give a rip about the law. He hires legions of lawyers and one law professor to pervert the law whenever it fits his purpose.

What is Matty’s purpose?

Making money for Matty.

Let’s try another transformation.

Let’s re-think his PR goon’s statement.

Instead of “what Matty wants,” let’s replace “constitution” with “making money for Matty.”

Here we go:

“Wow. That’s an amazing assumption that a
proposal signed by a bureaucrat and a foreign sovereign nation would
take precedent over making money for Matty.”

“What Matty wants.”

“Making money for Matty.”

That’s what it’s REALLY about for Matty.

Will of the people?

Come on.

Forget the constitution.

Matty sure has.

 

Posted in Me & Matty | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Matty’s lawbook-totin’ goon

By Joel Thurtell

Is there any sense trying to parse logic from an op-ed by a Matty Moroun henchman?

I’m referring to the piece by Bob Sedler, who used to be on reporters’ short list of law professors to call about constitutional questions.

Sedler wasted his credibility with journalists when he started endorsing Matty’s checks.

He’s a Wayne State University law prof.

Normally, you’d expect independence from a prof.

Wouldn’t you?

Am I being naive to think that a teacher on the public payroll ought to assume some degree of objectivity?

Hard to do when you bank Matty’s money.

So it’s no surprise that Sedler attacks the agreement between Gov. Snyder and Canada as being contrary to the Michigan Constitution.

That’s what he’s paid to write.

Too bad for Wayne State — Sedler trashes the university’s credibility when he hires out to Matty.

I’d just laugh it off, except for one statement in Sedler’s Detroit Free Press opinion column:

According to Sedler, “The Legislature must adopt laws concerning the maintenance and replacement of Michigan’s portion of the bridge, as well as laws concerning Michigan’s liability for injuries on the bridge, for the transport of hazardous materials and a myriad of other issues that only the Legislature can resolve.”

That is an amazing remark coming from a Moroun hireling.

“Hazardous materials”?

Sedler must not have shown his article to Matty.

He may be a billionaire, but he’s not dumb.

He knows a faux pas when he sees it.

Once again, Free Press editors must have been snoozing, too.

Hazardous materials are not permitted on Matty’s rival Ambassador Bridge.

That’s why there’s a Detroit-Windsor Truck Ferry owned and operated independently of Matty Moroun.

To carry hazardous materials by barge across the Detroit River because they are not allowed on Matty’s bridge that was built for Model T cars.

Not a subject Matty would want aired.

And “laws concerning the maintenance and replacement of” the bridge?

Matty doesn’t allow state inspectors on his bridge.

Where has the Legislature been on regulating this ancient bridge?

In Matty’s pocket, taking his money the same as Professor Sedler.

Without thinking, Sedler makes a case for a new bridge that is not only maintained but regulated by government, unlike Matty’s outlaw span.

A bridge that can transport hazardous materials so they don’t have to cross the international border by boat.

A bridge that can be inspected by credible inspectors and not ones hired by the owner, Matty Moroun.

Really, is anybody reading Sedler’s stuff before it hits the presses?

Quick, Matty — stop payment on his check.

He did you no service.

 

 

Posted in Me & Matty | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Insurance against Matty

By Joel Thurtell

My July 7 deadline for breaking ground on the bridge at Detroit may not be needed.

I wanted to forestall Matty Moroun and his threatened anti-government bridge ballot proposal by having construction underway by election time.

Fait accompli.

Looks like Gov. Snyder and the Canadians came up with another way of short-circuiting Matty.

The agreement between Michigan and Canada is based on Michigan law as it existed last Friday, June 15, 2012. That’s when Gov. Snyder and Canadian Prime Minister Steve Harper signed the agreement.

That way, if Matty hoodwinks voters into approving a ballot proposal that would block a new government bridge to rival his antique Ambassador span, too bad.

Michigan can’t scotch the bridge by changing its constitution in mid-stream.

A day late and a bridge too short, Matty.

Now, would I feel better if construction were to commence on a new bridge before the November election?

For sure.

The more ways you nail Matty down, the better.

But cementing the agreement in present law is great insurance against Matty.

 

 

Posted in Me & Matty | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Bridge deadline looms

By Joel Thurtell

The July 7 deadline for Gov. Snyder and Canada to break ground for a new bridge between Detroit and Windsor is roughly three weeks away.

Will the combined governments of Canada, the United States, Michigan and Ontario make it?

Seems like they have a chance, what with an announcement expected Friday of an agreement between Snyder and Canada.

Matty must be shaking to the very footings of his Ambassador Bridge.

Or rather, he’s shaking his lawyers for ways to sabotage the new bridge.

Who set the July 7 deadline?

Me.

It seemed like a good way to get the jump on Matty and defang his alleged November ballot proposal to scotch the government bridge.

Seemed like as good a date as any.

 

 

Posted in Me & Matty | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Matty loses a henchman

Matty Moroun

By Joel Thurtell

Who says billionaires don’t make bad bets?

According to the Detroit Free Press, Matty Moroun invested $44,000 in bribes, er, I mean, political contributions, to U.S. Rep. Thaddeus McCotter, fourth in line behind U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg ($82,700) and former U.S. representatives Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick ($78,700) and Joe Knollenberg ($61,400). Fifth is House GOP Leader Eric Cantor ($25,000) followed by U.S. Rep. Candace Miller ($23,500).

Matty could have tossed his 44,000 greenbacks off his Ambassador Bridge for all the good McCotter will do him.

Thad is history.

The five-term incumbent in Michigan’s 11th congressional district screwed up his nominating petitions.

Hard to believe that an experienced politician would let such a stupid thing happen.

Bottom line:

McCotter’s name won’t be on the August 7 primary election ballot.

The congressman at first proclaimed a write-in campaign and blamed the signature mess on an unnamed volunteer or volunteers.

Claims he was too busy doing Matty’s — I mean, the nation’s — business.

No time to check the petitions to make sure they were valid before the filing deadline.

How much do congressmen make? Not counting benefits, $174,000 a year.

Busy man of consequence that he was, McCotter left it to staffers to check over his paperwork. He needed 1,000 valid signatures, but turned in less than 300.

He did himself in.

Negligence.

And now, poor Matty won’t have McCotter to do his bidding.

Well, not quite. McCotter still has a few months left in office. When he gets done shamming help to the AG’s investigation into his botched campaign, he might find time to try sabotaging the governor’s plan to build a bridge to replace Matty’s antique Ambassador.

Somehow, though, with the AG investigating his office, he might be smart to keep off the governor’s radar.

Who knows, the AG might decide the buck stopped with McCotter.

Meanwhile, it’s not hard to figure why McCotter bailed out of his write-in campaign.

A bevy of well-known Republicans have announced they might run as write-ins. They include former state senators Nancy Cassis and Loren Bennett, former state representative Randy Raczkowski and Oakland County District Court Judge Kimberly Small.

The lone Republican on the primary ballot is Kerry Bentivolio.

Who?

One report described him as a “reindeer rancher.”

Hey, Matty — wanta buy some reindeer?

 

 

 

Posted in Me & Matty | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

‘Fixing’ Matty

By Joel Thurtell

The deadline for breaking ground on a new, government-sponsored bridge between Detroit and Windsor is little more than a month away.

Will Gov. Snyder, the US and Canadian governments make it?

Looks like a slam dunk to me.

Okay, the July 7 deadline was made up.

Pulled out of the air.

Cut from whole cloth.

By me.

But from what I read in The Detroit News and The Windsor Star, pens are being injected with ink for signing VERY SOON an agreement that will start work on the bridge.

According to Nolan Finlay of The News, the only holdup is disagreement over whether domestic or Chinese steel should be used in the New International Trade Crossing.

Once the federal procurement legality either has been adhered to or nixed by mutual agreement, ground will be broken.

But talk — and newsprint — is cheap.

I’m still tense about whether spades will turn soil by my July 7 deadline.

An ASAP start seems crucial to beating Matty Moroun, the owner of a rival bridge. Matty’s trying to pick up enough signatures to insert a proposal on the November election ballot that would, if approved, ban a new bridge.

I proposed a July 7 deadline for starting the new bridge with the idea that a start before the election would trump Matty’s ballot proposal, though I’ve argued that the feds and Canadaa could build a bridge without Michigan.

Any date before the November 6 election would have been fine with me.

Matty paid the Legislature to go away.

He subverted lawmakers with money.

Now he’s hoping to con the public by blanketing the state with ads extolling his antique Ambassador Bridge and condemning the idea of a new bridge.

The fait accompli of a groundbreaking would make Matty’s politicking irrelevant — that was my thought.

Turns out, Matty is looking more and more irrelevant.

The Michigan Constitution, according to news reports, contains a section allowing for “interlocal” agreements that don’t require legislative approval.

Matty neutralized the Legislature.

An early groundbreaking will neuter Matty.

The old alley cat is being fixed.

A greedy sociopath who just don’t matter.

Posted in Me & Matty | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

UM evades Michigan’s anti-racism law

By Joel Thurtell

What do the felon Kwame Kilpatrick and the University of Michigan Alumni Association have in common?

Both the disgraced Detroit mayor and the UM alum group have behaved tried to act as if the 2006 Michigan constitutional amendment banning discrimination by race, sex, ethnicity and national origin did not happen.

Fifty-eight percent of Michigan voters in November 2006 approved a state-wide ban on discrimination by the state and by public universities and colleges.

In 2006, Kilpatrick was not yet in jail. He was still running Detroit when he vowed to break the new anti-racism law and “continue doing business as (Detroit) has been.”

Now the UM Alumni Association, like Kwame, is trying to evade the constitutional mandate against discrimination. The alumni group believes that because it is is privately organized, it can use race to discriminate in ways that the state-chartered university is not allowed.

As a member of UMAA, I receive promotional messages from the Alumni Association. Mostly, they have to do with alumni gatherings, tickets to athletic events, regents’ actions and general press releases.

But the e-mail that came on May 30, 2012 was different.

It was defiant.

A call to action.

Voters be damned: We alums will help our alma mater circumvent the Constitution.

UMAA President Steve Grafton: “Since the 2006 Michigan law (Proposal 2) which prohibits the considerations of race or gender in university admissions or scholarship decisions does not apply to the Alumni Association, we are uniquely positioned to build an alternative pathway to a broader experience for all students.”

The association website repeats: “The Alumni Association (separately incorporated from the University) will generate private support for and administer these scholarships to enhance the diversity of University of Michigan student enrollment in terms of race, gender, ethnicity or national origin.”

Here is the essence of Proposal 2, the constitutional amendment alums want to evade:

1. The University of Michigan, Michigan State University, Wayne State University, and any other public college or university, community college, or school district shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.

2. The state shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.

What is so bad about that? Everybody gets judged on merit, nobody gets special consideration because of their gender or genetic makeup.

But it’s evident the UM administration wants to keep discriminating. It is just turning to its private wing, the alumni association, to promote banned activity.

According to Grafton, “the Alumni Association has committed itself to supporting the University’s diversity goals by utilizing scholarship awards and engagement activities to recruit underrepresented students. (My emphasis.)

What exactly does “diversity” mean, anyway?

Does it mean balancing academic departments so professors’ politics accurately reflect, say, the representation of Republicans and Democrats in the Michigan Legislature?

Does it mean that the number of professors in a UM department won’t disproportionately represent one school of thought or methodology over others?

Neither political persuasion nor variety in training and academic belief systems is what UM means by “diversity.”

Nor, for that matter, were these things mentioned by voters.

I mention them only to show that there are many ways to consider “diversity.”

Taste in automobiles, maybe, or art, or cuisine.

“Diversity” is a vague word.

But the amendment is clear: It forbids discrimination by race, gender, ethnicity and national origin.

Yet “diversity” is still part of UM’s official set of values: “As members of the university community, students are expected to uphold values such as civility, dignity, diversity, education, equality, freedom, honesty, and safety,” according to “The Gray Book, A Guide to the Graduate Program in History.” (My emphasis)

Recently, I noticed on an interior wall of a UM building a glass-covered, framed poster promoting “diversity.”

Regardless of what the voters ordained, and however it is defined, “diversity” is still part of the official creed at UM.

The alumni association lists seven scholarships meant to bypass the constitutional ban.

If you donate money to these scholarships, you can be sure that your dollars will benefit someone in a category the alums designate as contributing to university “diversity,” regardless of overall comparative merit.

“Diversity” is a cloak the university hopes will fool us into believing they are not erasing the concept of equal opportunity and replacing it with a system that would apportion college admissions and scholarship money according not to merit, but to some vaguely-defined criteria of UM’s choosing.

At UM there is groaning because, since Proposal 2 took effect, admissions of African-Americans have declined by 15 percent in the undergraduate college and by 28 percent in the law school.

What that tells me is that before Proposal 2, better-qualified students were being rejected by UM at the rate of 15 percent among undergraduate applicants and 28 percent among law school applicants. Their places were being given to less-qualified people whose claim to superiority was something other than academic credentials.

When criteria for making those selections are skin color and gender, when an institution such as the University of Michigan or its affiliated alumni association bestow things of value such as scholarships on some people and exclude others based on factors other than merit, I call that discrimination.

If the criteria for discriminating are race, then we’re talking about racism.

If it’s sex, then we’re talking about sexism.

“Diversity” must be made deliberately murky. Otherwise, its aim would be evident. It is discrimination just as racist as excluding black people from voting or keeping some people from jobs because they bear children.

Want to read more about academic promotion of racism?

I recommend Carl Cohen’s Affirmative Action and Racial Preference: A Debate, with co-author James Sterba, Oxford University Press, 2003.

Here is the UMAA’s e-mail:

 

Alumni Association University of Michigan of the University of Michigan
A message from the Alumni Association of the University of Michigan
Spacer
Spacer

Support the University of Michigan’s tradition and culture of diversity.
Donate by June 15

The Alumni Association has committed itself to supporting the University’s diversity goals by utilizing scholarship awards and engagement activities to recruit underrepresented students. Since the 2006 Michigan law (Proposal 2) which prohibits the considerations of race or gender in university admissions or scholarship decisions does not apply to the Alumni Association, we are uniquely positioned to build an alternative pathway to a broader experience for all students.

LEAD scholars are offered four-year scholarships and are a community of students, faculty members and alumni mentors. The LEAD Scholars Program works to eliminate the underrepresentation of African American, Hispanic American and Native American students on all three campuses. The program also seeks to address gender and racial diversity in University degree programs by supporting women and underrepresented students majoring in science, technology, engineering and math; and men majoring in nursing and elementary education.

Sylvia Escolero
Sylvia is the first scholar supported by the U of M Club of Washington, D.C., Carl Smith, Jr. Memorial Scholarship Fund. She plans to major in biology, and she hopes to attend medical school after spending a year volunteering abroad. Sylvia is already taking advantage of all that Michigan offers by joining the pre-med club, the snowboarding club, the rugby team and the Student United Way.

Her response after hearing she received the LEAD Scholarship: “Yes! I’m going to be a Wolverine! Let’s do this!” Learn more about Sylvia

Nathanial Hall
Nate was one of the 42 new freshmen joining the LEAD Scholars community this past fall. After serving in a number of leadership roles in high school to help those in need, he has continued his civic engagement as a Detroit Partnership Volunteer, an organization that collaborates with the university in various service projects. Nate tutored elementary school age children, and by doing so he brought the Michigan Difference to the broader community.

It is only through your support that the LEAD Scholars Program can continue to meet the vital educational needs of all students in the University community. As we move forward to extend scholarship offers for the upcoming freshman class, we are reaching out to close alumni and friends like you to help us. In order for us to succeed in supporting 40-45 new students, we are asking for you to make a leadership contribution.100% of your gift directly impacts the lives of students like Sylvia and Nate.

Contact Teresa Clark at tmglenn@umich.edu if you have questions or if you would like to know more about the program.

This is a critical time for the LEAD Scholars Program. The first class of graduating seniors just passed through the Big House a few weeks ago. As we share that success with you, we look to the future toward incoming students that need your help. Please make a much needed donation before June 15.

Click here to donate online now or make a gift by phone at 734.763.9702.

Spacer
Alumni Association of the University of Michigan
200 Fletcher St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109. 800.847.4764. m.alumni@umich.edu.
Posted in Bad government, Racism and UM | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

CABs: What I get

By Joel Thurtell

A few days ago, joelontheroad registered more than 5,500 hits in a week.

Not Facebook, but for a guy without the resources of, say Huffington Post or The New York Times or even a small town weekly, not bad.

I’m not about to engineer an IPO, however.

Facebook’s disappointing initial stock price is not the reason.

Rather, the reason is my failure to monetize this site.

Like most bloggers. I don’t make a penny from what I write on joelontheroad.

My first Internet venture was quite different.

I made money with radiofinder.com.

That’s because I was selling products — refurbished old ham radio equipment.

There was and is a market for old radios.

There is a market for joelontheroad, too.

It’s just not a paying market.

So why do it?

Have you been reading my recent columns about Capital Appreciation Bonds?

Have you wondered why a journalist in Michigan is covering what seems to be a California story?

My ongoing series about CABs is a testament to the power of the Internet.

It is that power that excites and motivates me to write about CABs.

Here is what happened.

Twenty years ago, I wrote an exposé about insider trading and self-dealing in a sewer project in three western Wayne County townships in Michigan. There was no Internet in 1992. The stories appeared on a Saturday morning in April in the Detroit Free Press. The paper enjoyed a high level of circulation and in the Joint Operating Agreement, aka monopoly, with The Detroit News, the Free Press was the only statewide outlet that could break a hard news story.

My sewer story had huge impact. Four months later, in the Republican primary, all seven of the elected officials connected with what came to be known as Sewergate were dumped. That was some vindication for me, but by August of 1992, I had been banned from writing about the sewer issue. Nothing wrong with the accuracy of my reporting. Rather the contrary. Infuriated elected officials lobbied Free Press editors, there was a big meeting with me, editors and officials in a Free Press conference room, the executive editor staunchly defended the quality of my work, the Free Press ran an editorial condemning the sewer scam —  and I was told no more sewer stories.

Sewergate was all about municipal bonds that were sold to investors to finance a $100 million sewer project. Some of the bonds were CABs. I learned about CABs from a bond salesman who’d been hoping for a piece of the sewer action. Cut out of the deal, he was pissed. He told me that Michigan schools were using CABs to run up huge interest bills that would come due long after current officials were gone. I was forbidden to write about the sewer, so I turned to CABs.

I persuaded an editor the story was important. For several weeks, I drove from suburban Detroit to Lansing each day. The Michigan Treasury people set up a table and put out all the files on CABs. I still have photocopies of every official statement of every CAB issue by a Michigan school district.

I learned that since the first CAB was issued in 1988, Michigan school debt — hitherto flat — had doubled from $2 billion to more than $4 billion and was headed for the sky.

CABs, aka “zero coupon bonds,” are designed to maximize returns for investors. In Michigan, we found interest rates of more than 500 percent.

In California, we found interest at 1000 and even 2200 percent!

School districts could pledge “no new taxes” to voters in millage elections, then cross their fingers because unless property values continued rising at 6 or 7 percent per year, a tax bill would come due when interest payments had to be made 10, 15, 20 and  even 40 years in future.

That was the essence of the story, along with the fact that school officials were being taken for a colossal ride and taxpayers were getting a humongous screw job, and the air around CABs was full of lies.

My CAB stories ran in the Detroit Free Press on April 5, 1993. CABs effectively ended on that date. We published what we called the “Big Graphic,” which showed each school district that issued CABs together with the purpose, the amount of principal and the amount of interest. When people saw what their school officials had duped them into, the air — suddenly laden with truth — got hot.

The following year, 1994, the Michigan Legislature banned CABs. Senators and House members referred to tear sheets of my stories as they voted.

By that time, I had been off the CAB story for a year. There was fallout. No problem with the journalism. Major failure of nerve at the newspaper. Just as with the sewer story, I was ordered to stop writing about CABs.

Maybe if Free Press editors had realized the impact those stories had, they would have taken a different view. But they got flak from purveyors of CABs, and frankly, few editors understood the concept of compound interest and balloon payment at the heart of CABs. Capital appreciates, and when you make no interest payments of years, capital appreciates in compound manner.

Not an easy concept for editors.

Anyway, the stories won the 1994 Michigan Education Association’s School Bell Award, but much more importantly, our journalism prompted the Leghislature to pass a law forbidding CABs in Michigan. All that happened long after editors squelched my Cab reporting. Believe me, there was a lot more to write. I had only nicked the surface of the scandal.

Still, I can brag accurately that my work saved the taxpayers of Michigan billions of dollars.

All of this happened before the Internet.

For some reason three years ago, I posted my Free Press CAB stories on this blog. Back in March, I was contacted by a Californian who had noticed that schools in that state were issuing CABs and running up huge piles of debt. This Californian googled for CABs and found my 19-year-old Free Press stories. And was impressed that Michigan banned CABs.

But my correspondent noted that in 19 years, no other journalist had delved into the arcane but — to taxpayers — costly world of Capital Appreciation Bonds.

That is how I learned that CABs are thriving out West.

Thank you, Internet.

And thanks to the fact that I posted my 1993 Free Press stories on joelontheroad.

Without those posts, my California contact would not have happened. The stories had the same effect on that person’s research — enlightenment.

Education on how bad CABs are.

I don’t make a nickel publishing these articles.

But I know how powerful those 1993 newspapers stories of mine were. They taught legislators.

They responded by giving CABs the boot.

It happened in Michigan.

It can happen in California.

So far, mainstream California journalists have not tuned in.

Doesn’t matter.

Anybody who wants to know what’s going on with CABs in California can find my stories.

They don’t need the LA Times.

No, I don’t make money doing this.

But if I can help inform the public and policy-makers about the abuse of CABs, maybe, just maybe, California’s Legislature will do what Michigan lawmakers did.

Boot CABs.

If that happened, well, believe me, it would beat money.

 

Posted in Bloggery, CAB scams, future of newspapers, Joel's J School, Muni bonds | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Chicago’s police riot and Reuters’ memory hole

By Joel Thurtell

George Orwell explained how history could be obliterated — state-appointed historians in his novel, 1984, would simply clip offending facts out of news reports and drop them down the “memory hole.”

Reuters, a self-styled news service, had a similar purpose in judging that the events of the most recent protests in Chicago — benign in Reuters’ view — somehow negate the brutal behavior of Chicago cops during the 1968 Chicago Democratic convention.

“Erase” is the operative word in Reuters’ judgment.

There were no police thugs in ’68. Simple as that.

Reuters has a problem.

Me.

I was there in ’68.

I got whacked for no reason.

And I have not forgotten.

What happened to me is not something that Reuters or anyone else can erase.

I wrote plenty about Chicago and ’68 on this blog during the 40th anniversary of the pig show.

I saw Chicago cops whacking people in Grant Park for no reason.

Unprovoked violence — police violence.

Erased?

Chicago can’t cleanse that stain from its history.

Chicago does not own a memory hole.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Bad government, Chicago '68, Joel's J School | Leave a comment

How CABs work

By Joel Thurtell

Wanta parley three hundred bucks into five grand?

Easy. Here’s how you could’ve done it last summer, had you known that the Poway Unified School District in San Diego was going to issue Capital Appreciation Bonds at a 94 percent discount.

And if you’d bought one of the Poway bonds with a face value of $5,000.

Your cost?

$300.

Forty years later, you will collect five thousand smackers.

Sweet, huh?

Good ol’ compound interest.

Poway borrows $105 million in 2011.

The school pays no interest for a couple decades.

That’s why CABs sometimes are called “zero coupons.”

The “coupon rate” of a bond is the annual interest the borrower pays for use of the money. A normal, current interest bond might have a coupon rate of five percent, meaning the investor is paid five percent interest per year.

Current-interest bonds work something like a home mortgage. A borrower might expect to pay interest equal to the loan principal.

CABs don’t pay interest for a number of years. The coupons have zero interest.

But oh boy! Interest is compounding all the while.

And “zero” is not its middle name.

By 2051, if you bought a $5,000 Poway bond for $300, you will collect $4,700 in profit.

Collectively, investors will reap nearly $1 billion in interest on Poway’s $105 million debt.

Who pays?

Why, the taxpayers of Poway, that’s who.

Capital Appreciation Bonds, or “zero coupon” bonds, are such a massive rip-off that Michigan banned CABs in 1994.

Now you know how to turn $300 into five grand.

If you time things right and know the right people.

Do you pay taxes in Poway?

Too bad!

Posted in CAB scams, Muni bonds | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment