‘Nature of the issue’

“The strife distracted everyone because no one could push back,” said one current trader in the office who insisted on anonymity because of the nature of the issue.

— The New York Times, “Discord at Key JPMorgan Unit Is Blamed in Bank’s Huge Loss,” May 20, 2012, Page 1A

By Joel Thurtell

Because of the nature of the issue.

That line is acceptable at the Times for withholding a source’s name in an article that heaps blame for $3 billion in stock trading losses on an executive who is gone?

Come on, New York Times!

Why give cover to cowards?

Well, without bile from masked mudslingers, Times reporters Jessica Silver-Greenberg and Nelson D. Schwartz had at best an inside-the-paper headline.

Heaping blame on Ina Drew, the recently resigned head of JPMorgan’s chief investment office unit, elevated the story to 1A status.

Nobody has accused Ina Drew of making three billion bucks worth of bad trades.

The bad stuff was done on her watch, so she fell on her sword.

Gone, history.

Why are we reading about her?

Wait — who did the bad trades?

Not Ina Drew. According to the Times, she was not around very much.

The cat was away, so who was playing?

Could it have been…traders?

Hmmm.

And who are the spineless wretches spilling their guts to the Timesters?

Traders who still have their jobs.

Drew is gone.

Her boss, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon, did not do the bad trades.

Still, his credibility, like Drew’s, is on the line: The buck stops at the top.

We could very well see Dimon’s name in the list of casualties, along with Drew.

But these anonymous traders still work in the very office where all the trouble was made.

Maybe they did the bad trades!

How self-serving for these traders to INSIST on anonymity so they can skewer someone who has already taken responsibility and decamped.

They don’t have the balls to skewer Dimon, because for now, at least, he’s still in charge.

He could still fire someone who attacks him directly.

Could dump someone who goes after him indirectly, too. Say, for instance, by slandering Dimon’s former lieutenant, Ina Drew.

Perps looking to shift blame would love to feed bullshit to a gullible Times reporter or two willing to let them point at Ina Drew.

Hint to scapegoaters: Tell the journalists you can’t let them print your name…

…because of the nature of the issue.

 

 

 

Posted in Joel's J School | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Hey, California! Michigan school sued lawyers & won $15 million

By Joel Thurtell

Think about this, Californians:

In the early 1990s, a Michigan school district actually sued its attorneys in a CAB deal turned sour.

Amazing!

Pontiac schools won a $15-million-dollar settlement against their bond counsel, the prestigious firm of Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone.

For anyone interested in how bond deals are cut, the case was an eye-opener — a one-time-only opportunity to observe how bonds are made.

I call it amazing, because it was unheard of for a school board to attack its law firm — especially an elite firm like Miller, Canfield.

Not that plenty of schools didn’t have cause to question their generous “friends” in the bond industry.

Like the proverbial butcher shop where sausages are manufactured, the creation of Capital Appreciation Bonds is pretty disgusting if you’re not one of the bond underwriters or investors getting rich from it.

It’s not only the profiteering.

It the payola.

You know, the old quid pro quo.

Nobody wants to call it what it is: bribes.

Somehow, school officials forgot they were supposed to get the best deal for the public.

With the underwriters, lawyers and supposedly independent financial advisers, it was all about their profits.

Screw the taxpayer.

The Pontiac case cranked out a lot of sausage. During the process of discovery, school attorneys got loads of normally secret company records of expenses billed to schools.

Expenses like golf outings, lunches, finder’s fees and the like — expenses that should have been eaten by the underwriters that were in some cases billed to the local schools.

I have copies of those records, thanks to discovery in the Pontiac case. I will be sharing these gems here on joelontheroad.

The payola involved more districts than Pontiac. There was plunder where I live, in the Plymouth-Canton district — and other places, too.

The superintendent of Allen Park schools got the boot for looting taxpayers.

Most school officials got away with it.

This 19-year-old Michigan story is relevant now in California.

We know of $20 billion in Capital Appreciation Bonds issued in California since 2000. Interest on those bonds is unknown, but likely around $70 billion.

We know one California district is robbing and will be robbing its taxpayers until 2051. Poway will pay almost $1 billion to borrow $100 million.

Here, reprinted with permission of the Detroit Free Press, is my April 5, 1993 article about the Pontiac lawsuit against Miller, Canfield.

If you are an honest California school official, county treasurer, district attorney or attorney general, you might consider these Michigan newspaper stories as a kind of road map showing the way to graft.

Headline: PONTIAC SCHOOLS SUE LAW FIRM OVER ISSUE

Sub-Head:

Byline:  JOEL THURTELL FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER

Pub-Date: 4/5/1993

Memo:  ; BUYING NOW, BUT PAYING LATER

Correction:

Text: In the very competitive, but very staid, world of bond sales, the Pontiac
School District has done the unthinkable — dragged its own law firm into
court, charging legal malpractice in a $54-million  bond deal.

In a lawsuit, the district accuses Detroit’s prestigious Miller, Canfield,
Paddock and Stone of botching the language of a Feb. 5, 1991, ballot proposal
in which voters authorized the bond sale.

Dennis Pollard, the district’s attorney, said in the lawsuit that the
proposal failed to mention that part of the bond sale proceeds were needed for
a new school bus garage; as a result,  the money can’t be used for a garage
and the present one is sinking into a swamp.

Miller, Canfield claims that school officials never told George Stevenson,
the lawyer handling the bonds, about  plans for the new garage.

Pontiac claims, too, that Stevenson  did not disclose that the law firm
was working for the bond underwriter, Kemper Securities, and the Michigan
Municipal Bond Authority,  which had a hand in marketing the bonds.

Richard Barch, a financial adviser active in Michigan bond sales, said it
is not unusual for one law firm to handle different ends of a deal,
representing  both the government agency selling the bonds and the
underwriting firm, which buys them wholesale and sells them retail.

“I don’t think it’s that much of a conflict, although it may have the
appearance  of it,” Barch said. “It’s sort of a friendly marriage. It’s not
like a divorce.”

The dominant law firm for school bond sales in Michigan, Thrun, Maatsch
and Nordberg of Lansing, has worked for  school districts and underwriters at
the same time on 41 CAB deals. Miller, Canfield has done 11 dual CAB
representations. All of the Miller, Canfield deals and all but seven of the
Thrun deals involved  Richard Allen’s firms as underwriter.

In a deposition for the Pontiac suit, Miller, Canfield attorney Stevenson
said the bond purchase agreement, “of any of the aspects of underwriter’s
counsel  work, would be the one where there is a potential for conflict.”

“The underwriter wants to make a deal, and in their pricing they’re going
to want to do it so they can sell the bonds as efficiently  as possible,”
Stevenson said. “That may or may not be in the best interests of the issuer.”

Caption:

Illustration:

Edition: METRO FINAL

Section:  NWS

Page: 9A

Keywords: ; SCHOOL;  PONTIAC;  FINANCE


Posted in CAB scams, Muni bonds | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Boxing Matty

By Joel Thurtell

Gov. Snyder, consider yourself small game.

Matty Moroun thinks you’re a rabbit dumb enough to be lured into one of his kill zones.

Matty’s in for a surprise.

I think you’re a fox.

When I was a kid in the fifties, you couldn’t turn a TV set on without catching one or the other of the “western” soap operas.

There was this wonderful cowboy metaphor.

“Box canyon.”

Wikipedia says a “box canyon” is ” a small ravine or canyon with steep walls on three sides, allowing access and egress only through the mouth of the canyon. Box canyons were frequently used in the American West as convenient corrals, with their entrances fenced. They were also used as kill sites for wild game, which could be driven into the confined space and killed.”

A box canyon is the Michigan Legislature.

You can walk in through the open side.

But the other three sides are lined with elected representatives ignoring their constituencies so they can do the will of the man who showered them with money.

Matty Moroun.

The Michigan Legislature is a slaughterhouse for governors proposing any idea that runs counter to Matty’s will.

Gov. Snyder wants to build a new bridge between the United States and Canada.

Matty doesn’t want a new bridge — unless he controls it.

A new bridge under government control would ruin Matty’s little monopoly, the dilapidated Ambassador Bridge, right out of business.

So Matty bought himself a Legislature.

It is Matty’s version of the cowboy’s box canyon.

Only Matty has so much control over the Legislature that he doesn’t even need to bait the governor into his trap.

Last year, his hirelings — aka legislators — murdered the governor’s bridge proposal in committee.

The guv never even made it to the floor of the canyon.

Now, for some time, it’s been evident that the governor is looking for a way to avoid walking into Matty’s legislative box canyon.

Matty’s making ready a second cul de sac.

He wants to entice the guv into the trap of Michigan popular opinion.

Matty thinks public opinion is like the Legislature.

For sale.

According to the Michigan Campaign Finance Network, this year Matty has spent $1.6 million and last year $6 million on TV lies against the new bridge.

Money talks and liars win in the box canyon of public opinion.

All this posturing is meant to pave the way to a landslide win for Matty’s proposed referendum on the public bridge in November.

The referendum is another of Matty’s box canyons.

All the governor has to do is not set foot in Matty’s kill sites.

If Matty were truly interested in democratic legitimacy, he’d be pushing for votes across Canada and the United States, since all Canadians and Americans have an interest in this project.

But a win for Matty across two nations would be far more expensive and far less certain — definitely not a box canyon.

All these little box canyons of Matty’s add up to one huge strategic blunder.

Matty has turned Michigan into a box canyon, and he’s driving himself into his own trap.

In kowtowing to Matty, the Michigan Legislature has written itself out of the script.

Michigan Legislature.

November referendum.

Irrelevant.

Powerful interests in Michigan and Ontario are driving this. So are the the federal governments of the United States and Canada.

Two nations against one billionaire.

Watch your step, Matty — you’re stumbling into your own box.

 

Posted in Me & Matty | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

See no evil: CABS and media

By Joel Thurtell

Thanks to Kevin Dayton of the Dayton Public Policy Institute for noticing my recent columns about the evils of Capital Appreciation Bonds.

He covered the May 11, 2012 meeting of California’s League of Bond Oversight Committees annual conference in Sacramento, where there was a presentation featuring bad news CABs.

As near as I can tell, he’s a one-man think tank who goes to public meetings when he thinks important matters will be discussed without REAL media coverage.

Like me, he’s a blogger. We don’t have fancy business cards with the logo of some newspaper chain embossed beside our names. But we have eyes, ears and brains.

Dayton points out correctly that municipal bonds are not an exciting topic. Where news reporters are concerned, a crime story will trump a school finance story for eye-dazzling, paper-selling headlines.

A friend sent links to my blog columns on CABs to California media outlets, including the Los Angeles Times.

I’m not holding my breath.

There are other reasons besides lack of sex appeal why news people ignore stories about government finance.

Financial stories are a lot more complicated and require more commitment of attention and intelligence than the homicides and petty scandals that keep news people busy.

Still, you’d think reporters would wise up. Don’t they have a sense of public service?

What can be right about gouging property owners for interest compounded to hundreds or even thousands of percent?

Well, there is this other matter. About the movers and the shakers.

The problem with news media is that all too often they see their role in the community as being boosters.

If a town’s leading citizens, such as school board members and administrators, endorse something, it must be okay.

And if it’s not okay, who are they to blow the whistle on their comrades in the Lions, Kiwanis, Rotary or other social networking organizations they belong to?

So much for establishment reflex.

News editors like to think of themselves as members of the elite.

It is not surprising that newspapers often get behind school bond proposals.

That was the case in Michigan in the late 1980s and early 1990s when CABs were being issued by dozens of school districts. In four years, Michigan school debt doubled from $2 billion to $4 billion and was headed for the stars.

Until CABs were outlawed.

CABs were banned in Michigan as a direct result of my reporting on them in the Detroit Free Press. They simply could not stand the light of day.

Now, look at California, where the Poway Unified School District last year sold $105 million of bonds that will require repayment of nearly $1 billion in interest ending in 2051.

Did local news people sniff around and smell something tainted with that bond proposal?

Some citizens raised objections to the bonds, but the San Diego Union-Tribune editorialized for the 2008 proposal, repeating the “no new taxes” mantra they acquired from school officials.

It was a lie, but hey! Be cool, news people. Support schools!

Sad to say, in this case, backing school policy means voters get screwed.

True support of Poway schools would have meant denouncing the proposal as a fraud.

California schools have issued more than 1,000 CABs since 2000. They are bad, bad news. Nary a peep from the press.

The word is getting out.

Joelontheroad.

Kevin Dayton.

Wonder when — if ever — the REAL media will speak up?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in CAB scams, Muni bonds | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

‘Mattycrat’ = rich bully

Plutocracy (from Ancient Greek ploutos, meaning “wealth,” and kratos, meaning “power, rule”) is rule by the wealthy, or power provided by wealth.

Wikipedia

We have heard that Gov. Snyder intends to do what we’ve expected, but
hoped he wouldn’t do: go around the will of the Michigan Legislature
and the people who elected them, in order to advance his own agenda.

— Mickey Blashfield, henchman for Matty Moroun

By Joel Thurtell

Hey, Matty — I hear you caught amnesia.

That’s the only way I can figure that preposterous statement by your toady accusing Gov. Snyder of “going around the will of the Michigan Legislature.”

How else but through stunning lack of memory can you justify claiming the governor is circumventing the Legislature “in order to advance his own agenda”?

Let me refresh your memory, Matty.

Who was it, Gov. Snyder or you, the billionaire sociopath, who lavished money on members of the Legislature and bottled up the governor’s bridge bill?

Whose money — Gov. Snyder’s or yours — bought the committee votes that prevented the governor’s proposal for a new international bridge from coming to a vote in the Michigan House of Representatives?

Yes, the governor had an agenda — bringing the New International Trade Crossing project to a vote in the Legislature and building a publicly-controlled bridge between the United States and Canada. Plain as can be.

What is your agenda, Matty?

All too clear: retaining your monopoly bridge, an antiquated span that can’t handle today’s truck traffic between Windsor and Detroit, let alone the kind of traffic we need to grow the region on both sides of the border.

You achieved part of your agenda by making sure the full Legislature would not have a chance to vote yes or no on the new bridge.

You are the one who thwarted “the will of the Legislature,” Matty.

Your agenda is clear, despite the millions you spend on propaganda.

Disguising yourself as a poor, idealistic small-d democrat, you’re posing as defender of the people.

Some citizens blessed with billions of excess wealth find ways of doing good. Think of Bill Gates, spending a fortune around the world to improve public health.

I’m sorry. I demean Bill Gates by mentioning him in the same paragraph with you, Matty.

While vilifying the governor for trying to find legitimate ways of building a new bridge, you’re throwing your bucks at the November ballot and meanwhile polluting the airwaves with false advertisements ballyhooing the “merits” of a decrepit bridge that profits one sleazy billionaire.

You want to veto a bridge that would drain profits from your monopoly, despite the obvious benefits it will have for everyone other than you.

You figured you could trick voters into doing your dirty work.

Now you realize that Gov. Snyder — along with our federal government and the governments of Canada — are about to outfox you.

If construction starts on a new bridge before you get your November vote, your ballot proposal will be shown for the farce it is.

Now let me ask you another question, Matty: If you are such a principled democrat, why are you not seeking a plebiscite in every community that would be affected by construction of a new bridge?

Why stop with Michigan?

Why not go for a ballot proposal in Ontario? In the entire United States and Canada?

Risk management, that’s why.

You know how to corrupt Michigan politics. Corrupting the rest of the United States, let alone Canada, would cost far more money and be certain to fail.

What you really believe in, Matty, is government dictated by whining, greedy rich guys like yourself.

Plutocrat — that’s you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Me & Matty | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

CABs and consequences

By Joel Thurtell

Gray Davis.

If I were a member of the Poway Unified School District in San Diego and my name was

Penny Ranftle

Linda Vanderveen

Andy Patapow

Mark Davis

Todd Gutschow,

I’d be wondering how soon I’d make the list of California public officials  — like Gray Davis — who have been unelected in a recall election.

Dishonesty would be a major reason for removal.

Board members lied when they assured voters that a $105 million bond issue would bring no new taxes when interest on the debt runs to 1000 percent with a $1 billion payoff that will indeed mean new taxes if real estate doesn’t increase hundreds of percent in value.

How can the people trust school board members who sign up property owners for a royal screw job?

Stupidity would be another reason for removal.

When the nation has seen property values plummet in recent years, what kind of dumbie would gamble that property would increase 300 and 400 percent in order to pay a billion dollars of interest on 105 million of principal?

Was there some other reason why Poway school officials rolled over for underwriters, bond attorneys and financial advisers?

We know that in Michigan during the late 1980s and early 1990s, the aforesaid class of profiteers — underwriters and financial advisers in particular — spread their wealth among the patsies — I mean elected school board members and school administrators who were key to making the bond decision. Golf outings, lunches, trips to New York with stays in a fancy hotel, dinners and Broadway plays were the trinkets and baubles that lured Michigan school officials into betraying the trust of their electorate.

The expense of those enticements was billed back to the taxpayers, in a kind of dual fraud that boggles the mind.

First, take the bribe, betraying the public once.

Then bill the cost of the bribe back to the school district, insulting taxpayers a second time.

Recall might be the least of these school board members’ worries.

I don’t know that this kind of behavior took place in Poway. Maybe those school board members were simply dopes.

But we have seen that one Michigan school district — Pontiac — sued its bond attorney in a CAB deal and collected a $15 million settlement.

It doesn’t cost much to file a lawsuit. If residents of Poway wake up and discover they were lied to and screwed, that allegation would be more than enough to drop a civil complaint off at the county clerk’s office.

While Poway is the poster child for bad CABs with interest at 1000 percent, it is hardly the Lone Ranger in issuing its CAB monstrosity.

CABs were thriving in Michigan for five years, 1988-1993, before our Detroit Free Press articles followed by a legislative CAB ban stopped them cold. By then, more than 80 school districts had issued CABs, doubling the state schools’ debt from $2 billion to $4 billion.

California’s CAB debt since 2000 is estimated at $20 billion in principal with interest a question mark but possibly in the area of $70 billion.

It’s not clear how long schools in California have been issuing CABs. Since 2000, California has approved more than 1,000 CABs. A good guess would be that hundreds of California school districts have issued these nefarious obligations. In future columns, I’ll pin this down with more precision.

Right now, as I say, recall might be the least of these board members’ worries. Even civil litigation might be a minor worry for those individuals.

They can sue you, but they can’t put you in jail for being stupid.

But if school officials accepted favors of significant financial value from bond hustlers, as we found was the case in Michigan, there might be something for county prosecutors and the state attorney general to look into.

 

 

 

Posted in CAB scams | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Deadline for new bridge

By Joel Thurtell

The deadline is nearly upon us for building a new bridge between Detroit and Windsor.

And the deadline I mean is not the November election, when billionaire goon-monger Matty Moroun may or may not have his proposal to ban all but Matty-owned international bridges from Detroit on the ballot.

No, what I mean is the July 7, 2012 deadline proposed by the loose cannon proprietor of this blog, namely me, for starting construction of the government-promoted bridge.

Now, I don’t mean to tie Gov. Snyder and MDOT down in any way.

Nor do I mean to hamstring the Ontario provincial government or the federal governments of the United States and Canada.

A few days or even weeks before or after July 7 will be okay.

Preferably before.

So don’t worry, bridge makers.

Let’s just get the thing started and trump Matty and his ballot trick.

I see signs that my deadline may have been taken to heart.

Otherwise, why the meeting in Windsor between Gov. Snyder, the US ambassador to Canada and various state, provincial and federal transportation officials from both sides of the border?

The parties are keeping mum about what they decided.

My guess?

The date.

The deadline for starting.

Did joelontheroad jump the gun?

Or are the governments going to break ground before July 7?

 

Posted in Me & Matty | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Scouting for graft: Look for Michigan in California

By Joel Thurtell

If I were a district attorney or attorney general in California — someone with subpoena power — I’d be asking hard questions about the behavior of public school officials and the people who arrange loans, aka bonds, for the state’s schools.

Did school officials accept freebies from bond underwriters and financial advisers?

Was the advice they got from bond attorneys independent or self-serving?

Might such freebies have influenced officials’ decisions about issuing bonds with, say, an interest rate of 1000 percent?

Specifically, were there trips, completely unnecessary, by school officials to, say, New York, under the pretext of  lobbying credit rating agencies such as Standard & Poor and Moody’s, supposedly to argue the case for the district’s loan-worthiness?

Were there first-class airline tickets for the trips?

Stays in posh hotels?

Meals in swank restaurants?

Broadway plays?

Lots of face time between school officials and bond hustlers?

Did school officials competitively bid bond deals?

Or did they hand the business to their “friends” who “gave” them swell gifts?

Ultimately, who paid for the bond rating trips, if they took place?

The schools’ taxpayers, maybe?

One telltale for corruption is whether the district took on enormous debt through an instrument known as a “Capital Appreciation Bond.”

Nineteen years ago in Michigan, I found underwriters and an “independent” financial adviser wining and dining school officials and treating them to “free” trips to New York. The officials would then select that underwriter to issue their debt — at huge cost to Michigan taxpayers.

In this 19-year-old Detroit Free Press article, Californians may find hints for questions to to ask school officials who approved high-interest Capital Appreciation Bonds.

Reprinted with permission of the Detroit Free Press.

Headline: ALLEN PARK BOARD SUSPENDS SCHOOLS CHIEF DURING PROBE

Sub-Head:

Byline:  JOEL THURTELL FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER

Pub-Date: 4/12/1993

Memo:

Correction:

Text: Allen Park’s school board has suspended Superintendent Michael Ferguson
with pay while it investigates claims that he sexually harassed coworkers
and spent nearly $8,000 on a 1991 trip to New  York that may have been
unnecessary.

Attorneys Dennis Pollard and Dennis Miller, whom the board hired to look
into the allegations after it suspended Ferguson last month, expect to report
to the  board this month. Ferguson could not be reached for comment.

Pollard, who is investigating the harassment complaints, would not reveal
details, but said they were made by two of Ferguson’s coworkers.
Miller is investigating the New York trip. He said Allen Park schools
paid $2,010 for three first-class airline tickets for Ferguson, then-board
member Jim LaBrecque and Richard Barch, the board’s  financial adviser. The
three stayed two nights at the Waldorf-Astoria hotel, which billed them
$3,957. Miller said the school officials spent $547 on meals, $195 on taxicabs
and $36 on tips.

Barch  said he took Ferguson and LaBrecque on the trip to lobby
credit-rating agencies in hopes of getting the district a better rating for
its new $7-million bond issue.

The bonds were guaranteed by the  state and automatically received the
state’s credit rating issued by Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s, said Louis
Schimmel Jr., director of the Municipal Advisory Council of Michigan.

Rating trips  are not unusual for many school officials in districts where
voters have approved bond proposals. Barch, whose Ann Arbor-based Stauder,
Barch & Associates is the leading municipal financial consulting  firm for
Michigan schools, said he takes about 20 percent of his clients on similar
trips to New York. He said no other trip ever has been questioned.

But a bond attorney said if bonds are being  guaranteed by the state or are
being insured,  there is no need to visit a rating agency.  “That was a total
waste of time and whatever money they spent,”  said bond attorney John Axe.

Bond ratings influence the interest rates charged on the bond issue and
suggest how risky the bonds are.

Asked to explain the expenses, Barch said, “I always stay in the Waldorf.”

Miller said $1,000 of  the bill is unaccounted for.

“There was a thousand for theater and stuff like that,” Barch said. “I
know we went out to a couple of nightclubs — normal things that people from
out of town would  do. You don’t want to sit around in a hotel room.”

To school officials, “it’s a big thing,” said Barch. “To me, it’s
something I need to do to explain the credit rating.”

Barch said he picked  up the tab and later billed the school district.
The board had authorized $16,000 for financial adviser’s fees, but Barch
added the $7,745 cost of the trip to his fee and billed the district $23,745,
Miller said.

“The trip was alleged to be related to a meeting with Standard & Poor’s and
Moody’s, but there is no documentation of that,” Miller said.

Miller said he’s investigating whether the  trip was necessary. “I was
under the understanding that if your bonds were qualified by the state, you
would get the state’s double A-minus credit rating anyway, so why bother?”

Barch said Allen  Park officials needed to visit Standard & Poor’s and
Moody’s because “Wayne County is always a harder sell than say, Kent County,
and you want to put your best foot forward.”

The trip did not result  in a change in the bond rating.

Allen Park school board member Edwin Frosheiser said: “I’m not saying they
shouldn’t go to New York and shouldn’t stay in a hotel.  It seems to us that
it’s excessive,  that’s all.”

Caption:

Illustration:

Edition: METRO FINAL

Section:  NWS

Page: 4B

Posted in CAB scams, Muni bonds | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

CAB scam in Poway

Proposition C

To provide safe and modern school facilities, improve student learning, and qualify for approximately $20 million in State matching money, shall School Facilities Improvement District No. 2007-1 of the Poway Unified School District issue $179 million in bonds at legal interest rates to upgrade aging classrooms, libraries, science & computer labs; replace roofs, plumbing, heating, ventilation and electrical systems; improve fire alarms and school security; remove hazardous materials; fund needed facilities, subject to mandatory audits, independent citizens’ oversight and without an estimated increase in tax rates?

By Joel Thurtell

The nicest thing I can write about the language used by Poway schools in San Diego is that it was shrewdly phrased. But when framed with the ‘no new taxes” promises flung out by bond supporters, the bond proposal amounts to a brazen lie.

Whether they put down “yes” or “no” on the 2008 ballot proposal, voters in the Poway school district in San Diego could not have known that the “legal interest rate” on some of the bonds they approved would amount to an eye-popping, wallet-ripping 2200 percent.

How a $100 million loan turns into a $1 billion payoff at 1000 percent interest

Nowhere in the ballot language was it spelled out to voters that the majority of the debt that was approved would be in the form of Capital Appreciation Bonds with interest rates so usurious that CABs were banned in one state — Michigan — when the monstrosity was exposed.

Neither promised “mandatory audits” nor “independent citizens’ oversight” captured the reality for citizens — that these pernicious instruments of debt could only fulfill the promise of “no new taxes” if property values increase by hundreds of percent.

Nor were voters made aware that there is no escape from this hall of financial horror. A term of the bond official statement states that they may not be re-financed to better terms.

Here in Michigan, I watched the value of our house in Plymouth plunge by 42 percent from its 2005 peak. Around the nation, similar drops in home value make California CAB promoters’ arguments for continuously increasing value seem delusional. Yet since 2000, California schools have issued more than 1,000 CABs with principal of $20 billion and interest that could be triple or more of principal.

All justified by hallucinations about growth in real estate value.

Now, here’s another unpleasant fact about the Poway CAB issue: It is written into the official statement of the bonds that they cannot be refunded. Poway is stuck with these parasites until 2051.

There were opponents to the Poway bond proposal, but they were unaware of how bad the plan really is. They may have had suspicions. In “Arguments Against Proposition C,” opponents stated, “Would you take out a 25 to 40 year mortgage to buy computers that last maybe 5 years, to trim trees, or to make plumbing repairs?”

The opponents had a good point: Had they known how costly these bonds would turn out to be, they could have re-stated their argument: “Would you take out a 25 to 40 year mortgage to buy computers that last maybe 5 years, trim trees, or make plumbing repairs at an interest rate of 1000 percent?

Here is the real question: If school officials had told voters the truth — that they were obligating taxpayers for 40 years to a sky-high interest rate to pay for short-term projects and that taxes might indeed go up — would the proposal have been approved?

What was so important about this proposal that school officials chose to scam voters?

That’s a question for elected trustees of the Poway Unified Board of Education:

President: Penny Ranftle

Vice President: Linda Vanderveen

Clerk: Andy Patapow

Member: Mark Davis

Member: Todd Gutschow

 

 

Posted in CAB scams, Muni bonds | 2 Comments

Disaster shadows Poway

Borrow $100 million, pay a billion in interest — 1000 percent!

By Joel Thurtell

I thought Michigan was bad.

Back in 1993, when I was writing about Michigan school debt, I was astonished to find school districts taking on debt with interest costs at two, three and in one case almost six times the amount of principal they borrowed.

But California always does us one better.

Think 575 percent interest is bad?

How about 1000 percent?

The power of compound interest — 2200+ percent interest in 2051!

Slimy as it was, nothing in Michigan approached the level of depravity achieved by the Poway Unified School District in San Diego when it borrowed last year to pay for building renovations, computers, fences, security equipment and other purchases deemed necessary to create an educational showplace.

The vehicle for this enormous debt was an innocuous-sounding financial instrument known as the Capital Appreciation Bond.

In August 2011, Poway issued $105 million of Capital Appreciation Bonds.

For 21 years, no payment is due.

Then, in 2033, the first property taxes will be levied to pay $30.5 million due that year. In 2034, $47 million will come due.

So it goes, with interest approaching and then exceeding $50 million a year until the final payment is due in 2051. By that year, principal will be down to $2.2 million.

The interest due on that small remaining principal, however, will be $55 million.

Total cost of paying off $105 million in CABs?

$981,562,328. (There is ambiguity, though. Another, figure is possible: $1,075,645,000.)

Let’s just round it to a billion smackers.

That is not a misprint: A billion dollars in interest to pay off roughly a hundred million in principal.

Ah, the beauties of compound interest!

It gets even better for investors and underwriters.

And worse for taxpayers.

The last two series of CABs, due to be paid in 2046 and 2051, have interest rates of 1279 percent and 2200 percent.

2200 percent!

It is a wonderful thing for the investors and for the people who perpetrate these financial Frankensteins.

But for the taxpayers of Poway who haven’t dumped their houses and skedaddled, the payback on debt between 2033 and 2051 is a financial time bomb.

School officials assured voters who approved the bonds in 2008 there would be no increase in taxes.

They had their fingers crossed.

The devils who designed this looming disaster are banking on property values in Poway increasing 300 percent by 2033, 350 percent by 2034 and 400 percent by 2051 in order to generate the tax revenue needed to repay the bonds.

Apparently, these geniuses didn’t read about the nationwide dropoff in real estate values.

Why is increasing value so vital to this scheme?

Under California law, the maximum tax rate that can be charged to a piece of property is $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation. With the rate of taxation capped, the only way the bonds can be repaid is by hoping for huge leaps in property value.

What if values don’t increase by hundreds of percent?

Taxes will go up, after all.

What if homeowners can’t afford to pay?

Or, what if they WON’T pay?

If taxpayers cannot or will not pay those new taxes, there is an option.

It is called default.

 

 

 

Posted in CAB scams, Muni bonds | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment